From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9DCD8385AC3B; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 20:21:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9DCD8385AC3B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1664828490; bh=3lsHcTBAUa2B495nmtp+k++Khirr7WDenZHk3ogij1U=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BkKfxk/cE2cx45L8NW/7LxmCNWN1fiTmiUHtRg+zVKrbTkaIodF640FjBDkN+/DXQ GyfMrv9ybgayV75WjomocBd/dcEpN6/N6SyodJp7QiznOZNeU5u7PtXSzfzNL8Cumt rN4wnyjvKIOebRu1cbT5ZetJNHdeXg2lkLXTZLOA= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107135] array::at() method should not be in for freestanding C++ Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 20:21:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107135 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 53662 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D53662&action=3Dedit Define function for freestanding I think I prefer this direction.=