From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C54E63858D37; Wed,  5 Oct 2022 10:22:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C54E63858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664965320;
	bh=tZiYdfmmD8I2NDKxJeq3CPH37UwP8amuMD0+0OrG8bU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cnXtnUdlGYqM9pYd4EuzOVoQ5fJnbUek59WhuUmgJucGePWsdZI9RA2aa2CsvvCsh
	 6d8cvOmnEJq9m5b1qAxvvlmFsrAmtbx7Z5VnQxcdUOl2JZq+poqaqZmZgrtWPxNGUP
	 KRxhTNFhI6pD2bWY8OrcQRDEBTXn4vxsqpd+50Co=
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107155] ppc_intrinsics is missing
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 10:22:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107155-4-OA8n1zLqEV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107155-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107155-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107155

--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The discussion in the duplicate issue revolves around whether the header in=
 the
sources was suitable (i.e. for something !=3D cell).

The Apple header (which presumably does not have these contraints, since it=
 was
deployed with Apple GCC-4.x) was committed to the Apple branch on the FSF
server.

my understanding of the rules (we have used this policy before) is that any
sources actually committed to an FSF server are considered to be contribute=
d -
so that we could forward-port that header.

It's a question of finding some time to fish it out and adjust the install =
to
add it and test .. (I have other GCC items much higher on the TODO).=