From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CEFC43858022; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:01:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CEFC43858022 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665662508; bh=8LY5HEu+sp87wuf77vhyyLT9u/75sZ4PgTqMHY5CDKU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZKaze+U1VKhkUHU6yyzidTK/WHSmbfscbQHuVmDDx6fsZaRe6MlVKLcY2WhyaCL35 MKnz7nusd+H9Kc1DmD7AWCALvx3tqkR9Y2fzwbjMiqvTK/3NXTjOhGtkUvP5Qwx9Nh vKN065B9W9SWOLwCkaWVKkQHf+eMm8/0dPz1dheE= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:01:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107160 --- Comment #13 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- A bit reduced test-case that can be compiled with cross compiler: $ cat pr107160.c #define N 16 float fl[N]; __attribute__ ((noipa, optimize (0))) void init () { for (int i =3D 0; i < N; i++) fl[i] =3D 1 << i; } __attribute__ ((noipa)) float foo (int n) { float sum0, sum1, sum2, sum3; sum0 =3D sum1 =3D sum2 =3D sum3 =3D 0.0f; for (int i =3D 0; i < n; i +=3D 4) { sum0 +=3D __builtin_fabs (fl[i]); sum1 +=3D __builtin_fabs (fl[i + 1]); sum2 +=3D __builtin_fabs (fl[i + 2]); sum3 +=3D __builtin_fabs (fl[i + 3]); } return sum0 + sum1 + sum2 + sum3; } __attribute__ ((optimize (0))) int main () { init (); float res =3D foo (N); __builtin_printf ("res:%f\n", res); return 0; } x86_64: ./a.out=20 res:65535.000000 ppc64le: ./a.out res:15.000000 so the result is wrong, it sums only first 4 elements (and not 16).=