From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B890A3858404; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:50:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B890A3858404
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665661831;
	bh=OpVlWs+NH7hKqeqRatRo0b+SdxVoTRqXg/cXVFJlHYM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ChKoxftaPNTgFWqaouCaZaIe+TF1K/mzpEWe+Ev1hCu8zgpGh5sEtuqU+eNOrPCLd
	 A1QpGgoFp4ygVcG6nxA3VW8Z0KjVpS5qHeuE+S9mpM7VMGISybJghL7JiLaYubcmbc
	 Ojm9cTBiktIj4TdTWeXJaUeVEn5rxPpKv/18tms4=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d  causes
 verification failure in spec2006
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:50:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107160-4-LVVK27KrLy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107160-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107160-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107160

--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107160
>=20
> --- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > > > Btw, I've fixed a SLP reduction issue two days ago in
> > > > r13-3226-gee467644c53ee2
> > > > though that looks unrelated?
> > >=20
> > > Thanks for the information, I'll double check it.
> > >=20
>=20
> To rebase to r13-3226 or even the latest trunk doesn't help.

:/

> >=20
> > I do - the epilog is even vectorized and it works fine at runtime.
>=20
> You meant the code on x86 is all fine? and the case doesn't show the "res"
> difference? hmm, it's weird.

Yes.  I'll try to look at cross compiler IL.=