From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 00C5A3858C56; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:19:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 00C5A3858C56 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665667146; bh=Yt7ZdSReZ32tLqZ7XmvPqcwuYeKvHxMMA4BOJ/HxHHQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=y4ibkrCgGcbV5NvVl2dlC/eFnjvZQ4uzadUuTw4mCkXFZE+J69UuRDeZvFrO64uaY PD5Y0SHBu6z+vjKLMUJSiVxOvoSbbY23mHk/TgO3+fPs5bXu4UY5+2lsR/Watib/v8 fJrI9LZ2fjn5y917y/eWz0tSGfJqaUuOqhsq3grM= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107160] [12/13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:19:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc priority target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107160 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[13 regression] |[12/13 regression] |r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d |r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d |causes verification failure |causes verification failure |in spec2006 |in spec2006 Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|13.0 |12.3 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- Fixed on trunk, but I think the issue is latent on the GCC 12 branch, queue= ing for backports. I am testing a followup fixing the missed optimization (PR107247).=