From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CF8E33858C56; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:45:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CF8E33858C56 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665661506; bh=BEWqwHos75LE0TfDqg8vTGSUWNzXtCgvBOHwXT2rVGw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hMa7FT0VtJSdqICN05zHkmTN4DVcdWg+FtnW+BLrG5OdVH0PMi4NyAR9u31FZ2cJe sf5tggXU6OCWDXl2vzD2nZjhUam+rgE/1Zas6SEMapORVDzqg41T8cnN5ERfRoJo4X 0K60BA2rnEl0iLt68wTmiqZ1Fp0Y3fdGlXbeuiHw= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:45:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107160 --- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin --- > > > Btw, I've fixed a SLP reduction issue two days ago in > > > r13-3226-gee467644c53ee2 > > > though that looks unrelated? > >=20 > > Thanks for the information, I'll double check it. > >=20 To rebase to r13-3226 or even the latest trunk doesn't help. >=20 > I do - the epilog is even vectorized and it works fine at runtime. You meant the code on x86 is all fine? and the case doesn't show the "res" difference? hmm, it's weird.=