From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D3EE63858C2C; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:39:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D3EE63858C2C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665002353; bh=vILCKd60XKUkIBpHk7g+66TM7uQn4sDjMoGAIFxqG/A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PmySrRv7cpb6l150hKDufdpxRRbQBfA7NAWzk1tkkb2eMrWNPhHfab2cVCo9iA6U7 1YPcsA/oUBqJ8LvmJDSrrH59mwoLmwOVGs0sJOoSfoRX3T8j535eyYOWQkNIXv7/lp eVGpXmRhEeyFPby6Mu6CQ8wZxK/NWKq60/ATnpYw= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/107163] [10/11/12/13 Regression] huge Compile time increase when using templated base classes, virtual method, and Wall since r10-2823-g6a07489267e55084 Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 20:39:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107163 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, using -std=3Dgnu++14 makes GCC 11 as fast as GCC 8.=