From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7F43D385843E; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 23:26:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7F43D385843E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666135598;
	bh=10C4+wqUyv3vXFvub5wh8qCv+7Y5wRExFMpO1LKJFIo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=u+TsV+KxYaB/8Z1giYZ+F2KxiZ1PZbV2e4q89y0wancidCr+I3cbq2adJf+bP9wx/
	 5koMluMF06TYHZlz4ku10oWL9Q9fM8E8yDLiAit+p1cWh0d1VfQnC1ZhXwQSGTEGc0
	 c5aIEDoklzzLXeJGPwODn2wDmwjV4g0G0E5jfTmc=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107164] No pedantic warning for declaration just referring to
 a previously-declared enum type
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 23:26:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107164-4-YnQlytoHFP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107164-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107164-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107164

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers <jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5f1d92fe2e1d75c3fae34497929a1965af704ae

commit r13-3366-gf5f1d92fe2e1d75c3fae34497929a1965af704ae
Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 18 23:25:47 2022 +0000

    c: Diagnose "enum tag;" after definition [PR107164]

    As noted in bug 101764, a declaration "enum tag;" is invalid in
    standard C after a definition, as well as when no definition is
    visible; we had a pedwarn-if-pedantic for the forward declaration
    case, but were missing one for the other case.  Add that missing
    diagnostic (if pedantic only).

    (These diagnostics will need to be appropriately conditioned when
    support is added for C2x enums with fixed underlying type, since "enum
    tag : type;" is OK both before and after a definition.)

    Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

            PR c/107164

    gcc/c/
            * c-decl.cc (shadow_tag_warned): If pedantic, diagnose "enum ta=
g;"
            with previous declaration visible.

    gcc/testsuite/
            * gcc.dg/c99-tag-4.c, gcc.dg/c99-tag-5.c, gcc.dg/c99-tag-6.c: N=
ew
            tests.=