From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 17F22385B50F; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:33:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 17F22385B50F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669829634; bh=5XOniS1pDLgqMdGAnpDNEAZXp18owfD7RJnXUyBBf8g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R86UOvP++1qpA1XD1cfGvAd/mWtbA0G435aa4es7pkp83NuULXyqVHRumpN12Y1Rl 14+XVeW0maflh78Wj0py2Yt8gZAGsoQu/ZoO/k31krvYmaesLBcziJ76wkdKlF/7T6 SZ8tm+7S5MoXJIKqWTANOJCyXk9eOW/1UYSjEtjU= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107172] [13 Regression] wrong code with "-O1 -ftree-vrp" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:33:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #49 from Jakub Jelinek --- So is the wrong-code issue now fixed? If yes, we should either close or at least drop the [13 Regression] part fo= r it if you want to keep it as a reminder that it would be nice to get rid of the UNSPEC.=