public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r7-2012-g43aabfcfd4139e4c
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:31:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107176-4-thH4mWGWkS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107176-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=42512

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PR42512 is also related and its "fix" is even worse...  it's worse in that
it hides wrong cases but also throws away correct ones.  But it also
shows that we still mishandle that testcase with or without the fix(es).

It seems that the intent of the SCC analysis in interpret_loop_phi is to
look at the linear operation (or the chain of linear operations) associated
in a way that it matches

 (T2)(init + ev)

from which then (T2) { init, +, ev } follows.

So when

 PHI' = (int)(signed char)PHI + 11

we directly match (int)(signed char){ init, +, 11 }

and for

 PHI' = (long)((unsigned)PHI + -90u) + 91

we'd have to associate the outer + 91 which we can't do (but effectively
do due to the present bug).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-06 20:41 [Bug c/107176] New: Wrong code at -O0/-Os on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
2022-10-06 20:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-07  7:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-07 14:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r7-2012-g43aabfcfd4139e4c marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-18  8:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-21 13:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24  8:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24  9:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 13:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-10-25 11:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 11:41 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107176] [10/11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:44 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107176] [11/12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107176-4-thH4mWGWkS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).