From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0B8F23858C83; Sat,  8 Oct 2022 22:37:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B8F23858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665268646;
	bh=xa1/mVgTH/vqjmFMh9yb3NtICZKKSRmrn+EhcgR1ZwM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=f7JMzL46z3iiqsRmjBpFWkYGE7U9tGPhIIRllvGmIn/lEhbOc3TJTCXQERFFHmAii
	 vl+jZ0u8bCmdb6eI1fdq+SB7my5MnE/QkikR+047p71UYRNQW0/So7bEBHuxKddC01
	 FqALszW07BlGxtlLqYNRXi4u6ZcPpB1Lu0WoozjA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107187] [feature request] Add `trivial_abi` attribute
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 22:37:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107187-4-XhDC7rnYI2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107187-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107187-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107187

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think a better way of implementing an abi specific attribute is in the sh=
ared
c++ abi forum and then have it accepted there too.

Then it could be the shared abi namespace like other c++ abi features are d=
one.=