From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5D4BE385840A; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:31:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5D4BE385840A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665390688;
	bh=ZTAdbacOh7vGRB/pQerTcz6NL0MRljTiW4F3FhAv6Vw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=vSaoPGntI9cif4mgQzGiGhSc8hFD+QIDnSWCznkjh4TJGUKR1y4//Foc9l//s+6Eo
	 R063vtYTEOaQSn+prJdqTgFlq36rM1RnUdILecvz4dJ6rkPULU0PL/p/1Ad9JUppxW
	 ys4D/LGEE5BHbyc8ps543bY3kRxQPzjZle+tUkcc=
From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107197] valgrind error in function same_line_p during build
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:31:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107197-4-Wox0Yay9qH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107197-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107197-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107197

Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |crazylht at gmail dot com

--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Probably the same as PR107193

I guess so, see comment3 in PR107193.=