From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E962D385842E; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:26:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E962D385842E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669829183; bh=1fGGcoD+pkHBW+tzCHzwCdelNK+bU4IR47UCD4lkq04=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HEKk8Xr18on6ij7lK0E9K2O9e7yHsTL5eRspyJIzgJoj/mCk98mmsChsMzP/TQhLh l/7MVGiW3wl6511UxLwKIh5sdKhOZowO1PQxye0DJbI88hSdsBnSjJWdLSWK6D6ei/ ghgabOBhzhlYYKsYvVhh6/XDI5m0QHLSh2lKI2cM= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107209] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: statement marked for throw, but doesn't) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:26:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, | |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.or= g, | |rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Looking at other backends, rs6000 uses in *gimple_fold_builtin gsi_replace (..., true); all the time, ix86 gsi_replace (..., false); all the time, alpha with true, aarch64 with true. But perhaps what is more important if the builtins fold= ed are declared nothrow or not, if they are nothrow, then they shouldn't have = any EH edges at the start already and so it shouldn't matter what is used.=