From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DAE8B3856DE0; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 08:03:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DAE8B3856DE0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665561803;
	bh=oqfbX9jtwADAJ0Vpmt1wHSVMzO3dQMOScXPAayVa5e8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Mrek5vUhysbYSQST9BPsC/4Lr+CeddUTRX7Xfgn9fOkPFcveC16QOIuLgELgkYHnZ
	 d+wl/o9ZNHvg16mI+MJ0JJcOHMmw5IDq/bnJnXB8xqLiE8y+v+aZ2DOFizYirW/flH
	 675d5XHxUgaDeD714x4Je6RcPnOARS0RJ2gGeOio=
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgomp/107227] Compiler bug in private allocatable array in
 OpenACC compute statement
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 08:03:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgomp
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107227-4-70UZy43rLs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107227-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107227

--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Spencer Bryngelson from comment #0)
>     5 | !$acc parallel loop private(arr(1:10))
>       |                                1
> Error: Syntax error in OpenMP variable list at (1)

That's because, at this time, OpenACC subarray specifications do not apply =
to
'private' clauses, but only to data clauses.

This is being discussed in <https://github.com/OpenACC/openacc-spec/issues/=
59>
"private clause with subarrays" (only available to members of the GitHub
OpenACC organization).=