From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0EE76385780D; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:44:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0EE76385780D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665765847; bh=S4s0YDA/Ic2GzW25JS6QLMuyIsMdMjF1oOezPp9pUkA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=V1EQtQ5jlWqeVanPIp4/Hv9roIi+177Ynzog3bUzDd+l2h7ukNslbtIfcEsFuVow2 V1l2YwR5JxdkBl2cjtqai48SQDSQfo1EIoJO+P66XSoPO0kD2K1bg5KOTBeoXoawYL /AMQ0bRZd8zs5AFEA9NsYie8wVV7mORxiF8cUumo= From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/107240] [13 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c since r13-3219-g25413fdb2ac249 Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:44:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107240 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #1) > I guess the first question is, is it expected that the > vect-bitfield-write-2.c loop should be vectorized on power7 which only has > Altivec and not VSX? P7 has VSX. It is the first processor with VSX.=