From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 309D4385AC1D; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:53:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 309D4385AC1D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665669188;
	bh=xlemHVaVlJHlyksDnxB/nEWP5FrypDRayIYfajecUug=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wN7z4LgUHoIan7SPjn4mRw6y/Rp/2pMBPRSahB4F/ZiN3B7CEbfrtCVkksS7l1NwV
	 2zsj/Zl+w9Lj6aMwu4dIyB27rAPpBIdGFb6CdmC6yjjxD35GTZGil9pRbFdimnrOM6
	 GRPGxze38GRBW9GRyZx5iDVE6+ApUiEgrP+0F6w8=
From: "avieira at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/107240] [13 Regression] FAIL:
 gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c since r13-3219-g25413fdb2ac249
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 13:53:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107240-4-OAoRB5YvPU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107240-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107240-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107240

--- Comment #2 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Seurer, Peter,

Adding something like: { xfail { powerpc*-*-* && { ! powerpc_vsx_ok } } } }
should xfail all powerpc architectures that don't support this no?=