From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B9A26385829B; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:16:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B9A26385829B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665602179; bh=88A7je8QY5rSN1a7NxlSXVyYApctExi5IX5Rc3O4nbk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ySW2Hp/OJiMa1S3LaVbZylS1W4/G0RnW9rUCH7sIZJIu5MTyzQL2vRfcPxXcgDuIc +Ew19drjK0KeA446SJovrqEyLRCL33nLNU+VPfssVSoR62L06+I9Blmb1eCZ+KGScw zskp67u2g7IIz3Oi/mzjmxQk+Rw5Fx4swnm4E2sw= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/107240] [13 regression] Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 19:16:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107240 Peter Bergner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meissner at gcc dot gnu.or= g, | |pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.or= g, | |segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner --- I guess the first question is, is it expected that the vect-bitfield-write-= 2.c loop should be vectorized on power7 which only has Altivec and not VSX?=