From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8F5C23858D38; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 07:00:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8F5C23858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665817257;
	bh=wgNPUBMxda8Z6aLlf+vHzdTNS4nyQ5tqq9VYO6orwVU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BKnrpwy35ArR/zzNUvI/7Ylre46f49u4wCyEdHsSn/FgF8N47187DzmysqFN+vtoj
	 RkDmtKzXDzyJwX5pkJBbFVCgu1CxPKbgek6If1g4axPlkItPtnhXg34Qit6z+4ZXaH
	 uxve7al42cORdEq8S4sik1rvbGjru+BQyJpHcynY=
From: "de34 at live dot cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107255] declaration and definition of a template function
 which vary in use of concept auto syntax are interpreted as ambiguous
 overloads
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 07:00:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: de34 at live dot cn
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107255-4-6HQrSNmsBr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107255-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107255

Jiang An <de34 at live dot cn> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |de34 at live dot cn

--- Comment #1 from Jiang An <de34 at live dot cn> ---
I think two declarations are functionally-equivalent but not equivalent. So=
 the
program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required. IIUC gcc is just doing the r=
ight
thing (at least something nice to have) here.

The current normative wording in [dcl.fct] seems defective. See also follow=
ing
editorial issues.

https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/5495
https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/4121=