From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A5D4F3858C83; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:04:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A5D4F3858C83 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1665763488; bh=lmPYvgndiosN7Rw01UtkYX50x12ugvKsffQOWNI53ko=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=IBFjQKfcQsg3zYRcXCRTOmDSqxyNSSrI1f98K4/6OXGb4B5NVkcSkrNBZa1kqPWaA rq2wefrtFZDQMSy4YzRBEFsbDAzRFP7qMohbNMB78ok+aXv7OHs/4D2gnt/DSVZA5M cPfix0/cJz5tXJ47NJPPAPZLTRIAspVm4BdElC0I= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBmb3J0cmFuLzEwNzI2Nl0gTmV3OiBSZWplY3Qga2luZD00?= =?UTF-8?B?IGNoYXJhY3RlcnMgZm9yIEJJTkQoQykg4oCTIGl0IGludmFsaWQgYW5kIGdl?= =?UTF-8?B?bmVyYXRlcyB3cm9uZyBjb2Rl?= Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:04:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107266 Bug ID: 107266 Summary: Reject kind=3D4 characters for BIND(C) =E2=80=93 it inv= alid and generates wrong code Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid, wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- There is code which expects that CHARACTER arguments inside BIND(C) procedu= res is kind=3D1 (alias C_CHAR): if (sym->ts.type =3D=3D BT_CHARACTER && ((sym->attr.function && sym->attr.is_bind_c) || ((sym->attr.result || sym->attr.value) && sym->ns->proc_name && sym->ns->proc_name->attr.is_bind_c) || (sym->ts.deferred && (!sym->ts.u.cl || !sym->ts.u.cl->backend_decl)))) type =3D gfc_character1_type_node; else type =3D gfc_typenode_for_spec (&sym->ts, sym->attr.codimension); If one now tries to use: call foo(4_'abcd') contains subroutine foo(x) character(kind=3D4,len=3D4) :: x ... end end this creates inconsistent interfaces! Alternatively, if we want to support it, we need to change how this is hand= led to yield proper code!=