From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B8599385841F; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 15:26:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8599385841F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1665934004;
	bh=Y5A1JKrUYRexFg01xpF9zlM+MmDW/+OM4EByuA14ha4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ni+AzaEYYvMWzhbzQdT03SxQwbKUAjWfEiZE2qL87BMKv0qYsfQKRP9NDcITomMjd
	 Kt6KnWCAc0PhBMb5VoNXC+3WqXzsCMZopraWFHLX2sgIR8OBr98qk+AjuDbIANPyOl
	 kE6z7s9F99M0Yzro1x9X/ju4NSEBnPm8plyqTi64=
From: "ky4ct at arrl dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107278] fails to correctly parse template default function
 declarations.
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 15:26:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ky4ct at arrl dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107278-4-TaBfMYRHUw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107278-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107278

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan <ky4ct at arrl dot net> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Iirc there was a defect report against the c++ standard here and you shou=
ld
> just foo instead of foo<T>


kd5eax@KY4CT CLANG64 ~
$ cat test.cpp
template<typename T>
class foo
{
        foo<T>(foo<T> const&) =3D delete;
        foo<T>(foo<T> const&&) =3D default;

};

int main()
{
        return 0;
};
kd5eax@KY4CT CLANG64 ~
$ clang++ -std=3Dc++20 test.cpp

kd5eax@KY4CT CLANG64 ~
$

kd5eax@KY4CT UCRT64 ~
$ g++ -std=3Dc++2b test.cpp
test.cpp:4:22: error: expected ')' before 'const'
    4 |         foo<T>(foo<T> const&) =3D delete;
      |               ~      ^~~~~~
      |                      )
test.cpp:5:22: error: expected ')' before 'const'
    5 |         foo<T>(foo<T> const&&) =3D default;
      |               ~      ^~~~~~
      |                      )

kd5eax@KY4CT UCRT64 ~
$ g++ test.cpp

kd5eax@KY4CT UCRT64 ~
$




(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Iirc there was a defect report against the c++ standard here and you shou=
ld
> just foo instead of foo<T>

If that is the case, can you please link the defect report against the
standard?=