From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C610E3858D28; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:02:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C610E3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666011734;
	bh=QPTHL5Po9YEuZeqcpwavXngwiUFQU4BQlmQuLcg2RCQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mJniav7BRrbshuK0CzEcDkD+0mZ4seGVZ1j1J7VkLPjq/2BCJUSPrb0wDt718cDEn
	 EJc7OVtaV3j3vDN42WMWNqWfYv470qkBbACsSBTe/HMuM0a6Khjj1Hq44ZdkQT5uBl
	 mI+PeRTpWZ8O94im0txksA/PzYRB0Od+pQ+xauao=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/107294] Missed optimization: multiplying real with
 complex number in Fortran (only)
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:02:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107294-4-zLzkK42xG7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107294-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107294-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107294

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh, and of course 0 * NaN also isn't 0.=