public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107323] [10/11 Regression] Loop distribute issue Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:22:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-107323-4-Rdq5BPQIMT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-107323-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107323 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28fe903730d2c6e424732184ab2d8b1e7d46db6c commit r11-10482-g28fe903730d2c6e424732184ab2d8b1e7d46db6c Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> Date: Fri Oct 21 09:45:44 2022 +0200 tree-optimization/107323 - loop distribution partition ordering issue The following reverts part of the PR94125 fix which causes us to use a bogus partition ordering after applying versioning for alias to the testcase in PR107323. Instead PR94125 is fixed by appropriately considering to be merged SCCs when skipping edges we want to ignore because of the alias versioning. PR tree-optimization/107323 * tree-loop-distribution.c (pg_unmark_merged_alias_ddrs): New function. (loop_distribution::break_alias_scc_partitions): Revert postorder save/restore from the PR94125 fix. Instead make sure to not ignore edges from SCCs we are going to merge. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107323.c: New testcase. (cherry picked from commit 09f9814dc02c161ed78604c6df70b19b596f7524)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 15:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-10-19 19:42 [Bug tree-optimization/107323] New: Problem with GCC optimizition fatemetmhr at gmail dot com 2022-10-19 19:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107323] [10/11/12 Regression] Loop distribute issue pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-20 9:09 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-20 9:12 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-20 9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-20 11:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-20 11:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-21 7:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-21 7:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-21 9:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-21 9:19 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-21 9:20 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107323] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-10 8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-24 15:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-01-26 13:05 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107323] [10 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-26 13:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-107323-4-Rdq5BPQIMT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).