From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8D5613854160; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:34:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8D5613854160 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1666344845; bh=cYmdPCYimhi3mB7hauftbNP+38PwRRcQsN/xdNrzVHQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tssiEChYHIZk9MZ2I/11pdNI7vcJ7odhv9OMyjHW6LB4+J2jb3QaFtl8dn5OUZTx7 xSSJnbgK2J3JgwIuNCaNKqDu8ATSG09hTZ3WqGMrnQeEP01LUUtAo3SbnxyvYkscMe cR4aJJkPhRLycdRZeT8wapbmpDhTdPAGjMmYz/HI= From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107344] GCC/nvptx SESE region optimization Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:34:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107344 Thomas Schwinge changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2022-10-21 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- Regression 'libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/nvptx-sese-1.c' addressed, but this remains to be looked into: (In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0) > GCC/nvptx has a "SESE region optimization", . >=20 > [...] >=20 > During investigation of that issue (which I suppose is just one random ex= ample), I found that earlier code transformations/optimizations may inhibit= this "Neuter whole SESE regions" optimization. >=20 > It's unclear to me if this is an actual "problem", which optimization is = "more important".=