From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 96A023856974; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:52:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 96A023856974
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666353146;
	bh=qopuVnGBJeIWALTT5Z20oPt7R4fYWrmrYAeCxLbbeQI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rvYlESLkEnbOLXenxEtqNFHg/pDeZsgV8Oos06BicrbuLH2M3/zUQax8KC4ZpTO1W
	 6VWbfWNq+6wmo0Gf5avj6EXNs0Ga5rd7OTzLgWf1ockDd/4Q9GP03oY2cH72eZ4C1i
	 uhSuFd4/gPmOQzzgU7wJTgpH409dPllhi2YCFSsQ=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107346] [13 Regression]
 gnat.dg/loop_optimization23_pkg.ad failure afer r13-3413-ge10ca9544632db
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:52:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107346-4-DjiXimi9zG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107346-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107346-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107346

--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I am wondering whether I should try to support this, or bail out of
> vect_check_gather_scatter if pbitpos is not a multiple of BITS_PER_UNIT. =
The
> latter obviously feels safer.

Probably the way to go indeed.=