From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AE29E3858D1E; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:14:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE29E3858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666444461;
	bh=+3fyngDMQx7qrfo6PFkR6Y+T326wrYQeKUnOxpXm5ac=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VTbwLmFApHWT7/S9TrnizSSCnBXipK0nt3KzmuBRU6fUUJ9hNQGUrlMG8RyLFdxPl
	 NMbs9Q+rBOdA2W1LnXR9Me6FFTGj2cXYaSNE2+WhOOUUwUVlaWxObKyA8OgXPlffbs
	 TSrkL4GmlvioM+VO0egU3jCPjfQh1t6hRkgRImks=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107358] [13 Regression] i686-linux: Since
 r13-3290-g98e341130f8798 code fails to build libjxl-0/7.0 (vector float code)
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 13:14:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107358-4-Wh6ojhT4Qd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107358

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|jakub at redhat dot com            |

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think that is the preexisting C issue I've talked about in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603265.html
typedef float __attribute__((vector_size (16))) float32x4_t;
float32x4_t foo(float32x4_t x, float y) { return x + y; }
where C also fails for years with -fexcess-precision=3Dstandard.=