public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107370] long double sqrtl constant folding is wrong
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 20:00:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107370-4-qcIZCLR8Q0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107370-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107370
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107370
>
> --- Comment #3 from jacob navia <jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr> ---
> 1 trunk gcc:
> 2 .LC1:
> 3 .word 325511829 # 0x1366EA95 <<<--- SHOULD BE 325508205
> 4 .word -922176773 # 0xC908B2FB OK
> 5 .word -429395012 # 0xE667F3BC OK
> 6 .word 1073703433 # 0x3FFF6A09 OK
>
> This data is wrong, I repeat, the first number (line 3) should be 325508205 or
> 0x1366DC6D.
Why do you think that number is wrong? If I compute the square root of
2**225 using GMP (so not involving MPFR at all, just integer square root
in GMP), I get 1366ea95 as the low 32 bits (and the next bit is a 0, so
rounding toward 0 is correct in this case).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-24 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 6:11 [Bug c/107370] New: long double precision is wrong in ARM 64 jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 6:22 ` [Bug c/107370] " jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 15:19 ` [Bug target/107370] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 18:33 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 18:40 ` [Bug middle-end/107370] long double sqrtl constant folding is wrong pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 19:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 19:53 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 19:56 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 20:00 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2022-10-24 20:01 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 20:08 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 20:09 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 20:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 20:25 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 20:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 20:50 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 20:51 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 20:56 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 20:59 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 21:01 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 21:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 21:03 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 21:06 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 21:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 21:26 ` jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
2022-10-24 21:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 21:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-107370-4-qcIZCLR8Q0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).