From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8E13A3861818; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:21:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E13A3861818
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707985283;
	bh=k/rDjLR9ZhcRFGIA/sQDsEZ6o2E8Ajfl8Yl1NJiwOaE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=o3iSzL1BN7Qd+8mYJT3reG5svPxNy7YUSFQ9W90HKp0GuxMlzEJH6P5TFM+Ac9rQj
	 D88WxxtfiRg/96XF2SW7XomW2Kj6UEK4a8PmilaMYyWXz98nnJcQVr8qbL0OXWe2qT
	 NcKHQwGc52Q8b1Czz22+Cia7oa0oXgAkeqy5gJYA=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107385] [asm goto] "=r" vs "+r" for outputs along
 indirect edges
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:21:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: inline-asm, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-107385-4-AgNiznxKmX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107385-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107385

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems to be fixed by the PR113921 fix.  But more test coverage doesn't hurt=
, so
2024-02-15  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR middle-end/107385
        * gcc.target/i386/pr107385.c: New test.

--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107385.c.jj 2024-01-13 00:05:00.0773723=
02
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr107385.c    2024-02-15 09:18:47.7112604=
27
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* PR middle-end/107385 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+__attribute__((noipa)) int
+foo (void)
+{
+  int x;
+  asm goto ("": "=3Dr" (x) : "0" (15), "a" (42) :: lab);
+  x =3D 6;
+lab:
+  return x;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  if (foo () !=3D 6)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+}

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 113921 ***=