From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5908E3858C83; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:47:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5908E3858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678873662;
	bh=BQ3mmN5JoC9y+POYEggD2pjYBi250/R72S2Lgfq26r4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JK4ZDe1E8cH4uUJL1O0NL1tjguJGcMYAn6+s1ANA2C3I1+flYrdHRdd4tGI7FXspk
	 QEDZGq3SUR68RmPb3T414NX++w/KaTxt8nRWnc1LDY2b4u4OHIX9yb5Iv5F5luosGf
	 EViopinLuMEUHsSfTw1PIerwk+NcO8W7hobWSU9c=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/107396] [13 regression] new test case
 gcc.dg/analyzer/pipe-glibc.c in r13-3466-g792f039fc37faa fails with excess
 errors
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:47:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107396-4-1tfnPoTrVQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107396-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107396-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107396

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The diagnostic is correct I think - I wonder why I do not see it on
x86_64-linux.  It probably depends on the glibc version (I have 2.31)=