From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 99BE53858D28; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 20:31:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 99BE53858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1666989119; bh=i3o5pm/0jym4MOij1FhO0OE5DAyX4ufJ/JnORVRi4TI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Nnb5u3cT0R+saeriv14CQDPDgJZpDWJ430vR+2UCNhyS22lU0bSc90vei/XxpyXbi 2XzM28l1JDKfEx6IFu3ZmtKnXoQsIJG7rkX/ntSAB1l3zlP3LVM7WyW79p3IgadqsV KGQnYBXFBz+2J+cjn4v6q/Bjg4GtHtTzQdjkxN2M= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/107397] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_arith_plus, at fortran/arith.cc:654 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 20:31:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107397 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #3) > This patch fixes the ICE and issues an error. It has passed > regression testing. Great! Do you plan to submit your patch? (Hint: git gcc-commit-mklog).=