From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4536F3858C5E; Fri,  3 Feb 2023 02:00:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4536F3858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675389657;
	bh=XKnQ7ep+6mHys4g8i5rby8/oTK6+wOSWbmIiYgPItUA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lGnTCPmTt60N8WRAKdH8nysm+7mJ7Z/NZuNR+/UFjMAFdaKz3kEahoBxBY7Hj8cAK
	 hy0n3Nny6UDHmjCZbdsjAw9e+Gst4HdLKx0mXafaC7ezMxq5cCvuNi6zu60QcTHVLp
	 V2UbgfMtWns8Jk9UWSZvqtGnfJQXluklgjyf1R/Y=
From: "rvmallad at amazon dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107409] Perf loss ~5% on 519.lbm_r SPEC
 cpu2017 benchmark with r10-5090-ga9a4edf0e71bba
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:00:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rvmallad at amazon dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107409-4-icFcJxolWU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107409-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107409-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107409

--- Comment #19 from Rama Malladi <rvmallad at amazon dot com> ---
Thanks @Sebastian and @Martin J. I will get another bisect between GCC 7-an=
d-8.=