From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4484B385B530; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:32:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4484B385B530
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676619165;
	bh=sqjnBs9h3qV/kp6ZSi7UEwClbrtXp9U/k4UAr0Mtow4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ld1lNPvyFLYvMr8iNC1Z7RWzYEKYIOttXQ5RgyqA/HiYHx/iW82bTgSCS1DhAL8tN
	 BryO1kUTlLtWkuQwDk7egbFCn88bLVG8Kl3J0P8QlyPrn1rmz+qQh2S63sL1IwufbR
	 vWvIDjUAvitJY8GIbzZoYlBlBbtPTUMJlkF5iQWQ=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107411] trivial-auto-var-init=zero invalid
 uninitialized variable warning
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 07:32:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107411-4-CCJWSn5bVY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107411

--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, qing.zhao at oracle dot com wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107411
>=20
> --- Comment #8 from Qing Zhao <qing.zhao at oracle dot com> ---
> > On Feb 16, 2023, at 2:35 AM, rguenther at suse dot de <gcc-bugzilla@gcc=
.gnu.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107411
> >=20
> > --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de>=
 ---
> > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> > Hmm, I don't think so.  So this is indeed expected behavior since the
> > frontend IL doesn't have variable definitions with initializers but
> > instead just (immediately following) assignments.
>=20
> Then, if that=E2=80=99s the case, it also is correct to add the .DEFERRED=
_INIT to them
> during gimplification?

Yes.=