From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DA9C23858291; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:55:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA9C23858291
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676580910;
	bh=jI54MrtYvtB8PWdHBG2mjT/xtipKNp7O8USJjJnDAn4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ntzKMollcHAYmI1m5CElgjyfWj7h0Xvrx43mEFAM99Lqcgin8mAipKZEUrCMfmWAa
	 sai9CLDwWssJNCBNcCceYUisYOknZS8wG5mpsNVDVfaD55wxEo5pUtzQROHO0+OscB
	 So+WS3SNanpkH/fJ1PH7lx2MVsQG8Me4dM1f7zPI=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107411] trivial-auto-var-init=zero invalid
 uninitialized variable warning
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:55:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107411-4-FDHizv3YjR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107411

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #10)
> the following patch fixed this issue:

This would leak memory.=