From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C33703858409; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:30:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C33703858409
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676557856;
	bh=nwCIik3Y4767KFLpsvCEnQyMEtZ5YA5CmZ4TNQV1L3c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UYjmQzjOBNW1U+k0TDu3LMpTjICWkr0j18tqtds01PlYINcvItFxJ/h2dR8zdQGhM
	 LMogYpUQLcmGuXD2hHpTePX/vDDgaIDW8tZPDAvbVM5oDVqCb4pAmn/asQr6QAHywi
	 zwdyEdhrB12Mp/taBo2CLbv2JHEQ5ksvUWA/ciXI=
From: "qing.zhao at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107411] trivial-auto-var-init=zero invalid
 uninitialized variable warning
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:30:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: qing.zhao at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107411-4-odY5EVVmmR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107411

--- Comment #8 from Qing Zhao <qing.zhao at oracle dot com> ---
> On Feb 16, 2023, at 2:35 AM, rguenther at suse dot de <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.g=
nu.org> wrote:
>=20
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107411
>=20
> --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> -=
--
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2023, qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Hmm, I don't think so.  So this is indeed expected behavior since the
> frontend IL doesn't have variable definitions with initializers but
> instead just (immediately following) assignments.

Then, if that=E2=80=99s the case, it also is correct to add the .DEFERRED_I=
NIT to them
during gimplification?=