public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107412] Miss to fold LEN_{LOAD,STORE} when the specified length equal to vector length
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 08:17:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107412-4-68lEM9Y6lO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107412-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107412

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin <linkw@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8408120fecc56385b316dafec1bdfe3aac61fc05

commit r13-3716-g8408120fecc56385b316dafec1bdfe3aac61fc05
Author: Kewen Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 7 02:07:27 2022 -0600

    vect: Fold LEN_{LOAD,STORE} if it's for the whole vector [PR107412]

    As the test case in PR107412 shows, we can fold IFN .LEN_{LOAD,
    STORE} into normal vector load/store if the given length is known
    to be equal to the length of the whole vector.  It would help to
    improve overall cycles as normally the latency of vector access
    with length in bytes is bigger than normal vector access, and it
    also saves the preparation for length if constant length can not
    be encoded into instruction (such as on power).

            PR tree-optimization/107412

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * gimple-fold.cc (gimple_fold_mask_load_store_mem_ref): Rename to
...
            (gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref): ... this, add one
parameter
            mask_p indicating it's for mask or length, and add some handlings
for
            IFN LEN_{LOAD,STORE}.
            (gimple_fold_mask_load): Rename to ...
            (gimple_fold_partial_load): ... this, add one parameter mask_p.
            (gimple_fold_mask_store): Rename to ...
            (gimple_fold_partial_store): ... this, add one parameter mask_p.
            (gimple_fold_call): Add the handlings for IFN LEN_{LOAD,STORE},
            and adjust calls on gimple_fold_mask_load_store_mem_ref to
            gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.target/powerpc/pr107412.c: New test.
            * gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-8.c: Adjust scan times for
            folded LEN_LOAD.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-07  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26  9:13 [Bug tree-optimization/107412] New: " linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26  9:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107412] " linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-27 22:03 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-31  6:39 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-07  8:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-11-07  8:25 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-07  8:25 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-05  5:28 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107412-4-68lEM9Y6lO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).