From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 37887384F8B0; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:04:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 37887384F8B0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669712689;
	bh=6wjRRailUMaZ6xaSm5n5XJVu9oTviFPfhQBPiWhfjDI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bqt9wZ32QWVycqvR0Z9eQEZMBsLBnNIlUAtAH2VukpEt5DzzEGEXfDrDXc5EtGQD8
	 yhDwvnl+TwI48oaYeJA674aWQtHbHMMCQUvvuXzNwXqVeXm/sVkWQAgRq/HCmaVR/R
	 9+YzNc2V0UitRulo70dg9YpThNJGf4DC7K7nJ1bM=
From: "rvmallad at amazon dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107413] Perf loss ~14% on 519.lbm_r SPEC
 cpu2017 benchmark with r8-7132-gb5b33e113434be
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:04:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rvmallad at amazon dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107413-4-j2637KEy76@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107413-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107413-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107413

--- Comment #14 from Rama Malladi <rvmallad at amazon dot com> ---
This fix also improved performance of 538.imagick_r by 15%. Did you have a
similar observation? Thank you.=