From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E7543385802F; Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:27:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E7543385802F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1689755262; bh=yMUMF2NyF3iBw0+2Xez0AaTcP5XlCyhiqEVAGBNoHrU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gl6AOv/+KkjglNHbG0MYywEPKxmkJOen+mftdNeDAPldYU/tkNqDXybNvpO6AFMTG DzitsEREyF5tVEz5q4W7bkObFLRljTHLkJnpi14HTqLzZPIfAfqXuLENXq1H+WbyCh Hg/aMSCr9VEpRXE1kSeTK7/+4lZhR0bbxWDOQwnc= From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/107424] [13/14 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.cc:5397 - and wrong code - with non-rectangular loops Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:27:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, ice-on-valid-code, openmp, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107424 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus --- Close as FIXED - see also PR110735 The original issue (the ICE) and the wrong-code issue (comment 2) were fixe= d in r13-5756 when it was still mainline. Thus, the regression is fixed and ther= e is no need to backport anything. As part of that commit, a "sorry, unimplemented" was introduced. - A simpler and possibly more common case was implemented in GCC 14 mainline via commit r14-2634. - The remaining issues are now tracked in PR110735.=