public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107432] __builtin_convertvector generates inefficient code
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 05:22:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107432-4-jl3g5M1nlj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107432-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107432

--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---

> It's lowered by pass_lower_vector, ideally, can we use truncmn2 in
> expand_VEC_CONVERT if src is bigger integer mode than dest.

Currently, expand_vector_conversion uses VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR

---------------cut begins------------------------
  else if (modifier == NARROW)
    {
      switch (code)
        {
        CASE_CONVERT:
          code1 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR;
          optab1 = optab_for_tree_code (code1, arg_type, optab_default);
          break;

---------------Cut ends------------------------

But BB vectorizer can do the right thing for 

void
foo (long long* a, int* b)
{
    b[0] = a[0];
    b[1] = a[1];
    b[2] = a[2];
    b[3] = a[3];
}



        vmovdqu ymm0, YMMWORD PTR [rdi]
        vpmovqd XMMWORD PTR [rsi], ymm0
        vzeroupper
        ret


  vect__1.5_16 = MEM <vector(4) long long int> [(long long int *)a_10(D)];
  vect__2.6_18 = (vector(4) int) vect__1.5_16;
  # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
  # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
  # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
  MEM <vector(4) int> [(int *)b_11(D)] = vect__2.6_18;
  return;


Guess expand_vector_conversion can be optimized.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-28  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-27 10:02 [Bug c++/107432] New: " g.peterhoff@t-online.de
2022-10-27 15:12 ` [Bug target/107432] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-27 16:14 ` g.peterhoff@t-online.de
2022-10-28  3:33 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-10-28  3:36 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-10-28  5:22 ` crazylht at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-10-28  5:33 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-10-28  6:55 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-10-28 11:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-31 13:02 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107432-4-jl3g5M1nlj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).