From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4846E3858424; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 05:32:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4846E3858424 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1666935174; bh=BEz/5RnF7sniRb5aKo3p+eWJrOi8Em1IQh4QUH3v7Ns=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eCTKtUlLEow5jWwhU46C2AdNzThmKrgMOLSvRxRlykgyfp/7l5LDGCLsqMpjZsqza jKBArEQ2pxNY4jsMzjkXzfuzwKaztzdJG94/DOQniE2XXt3ZvJ+unFkPYi+M6owkWS zdZF69wm0URHnqC1kbVU+n1U3p+2FfzUoTTjDM/0= From: "florian.schanda at bmw dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/107436] Is -fsignaling-nans still experimental? Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 05:32:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: florian.schanda at bmw dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107436 --- Comment #2 from Florian Schanda --- Hi Andrew, thank you so much for your reply. The architecture in question is Goldmont, is the flag alright for that target? > A third party library depending on signaling NaNs is slightly an > issue in general considering -fsignaling-nans is not on by default > and some (many?) targets fpu have issues with signaling NaNs in general .= .. Tell me about it :)=