From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D76FD385151E; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:21:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D76FD385151E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666966873;
	bh=oIK6eoPVI9bFq6/mKRsHWxpexWvaAOSCvuJ81QqD86A=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=v+slsuRAKoJrIEfz0OJS416H37jkR7jmO+bNOyqLJu3hOJMQiQ3Vbki1jJdtHp/3R
	 EBe0zNN2tKj6FySz2zHFH95YDus41dOgz6SzgluoIYfK8BWAxaoG5/o5QA4AnUCI38
	 B3zEwBrudbtZqdgHTkSL4q/k4FuG8NdZ6a4tZ3GY=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107436] Is -fsignaling-nans still experimental?
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:21:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107436-4-EPYuzqhbMB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107436

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Florian Schanda from comment #5)
> Richard, if I may rephrase your statement (for clarity), you're saying:
>=20
> > Under your assumptions, -fsignaling-nans should work. There are no know=
n bugs
> > in this setup, but if you find something please report it.
>=20
> Is that accurate?

No.  See the See Also bugs referenced in this bug.=