From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D2BFC3858414; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:26:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D2BFC3858414 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1666949189; bh=wZiCodoTYuvbsgkhJMIgYZNm8CBT2Dp/N+ZnGs/NsJI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IQOVDc2CcN3LVM3DJHyOrP5Fn93P+KdSzq7jNg+BxkuQSE7ZwZDyrwXPwOHx3PazE GMaE1mH+io5eNGDDrAOgvnhZQXfDBkVgf5MtcN67fSQQWYWED9k/dFQSlACvve4b6q zAXGQUIUKrBHbvnPB36k6w7T7j0G8fQSlfrarrwM= From: "florian.schanda at bmw dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/107436] Is -fsignaling-nans still experimental? Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:26:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: florian.schanda at bmw dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107436 --- Comment #3 from Florian Schanda --- Maybe some additional constraints under which we operate can help: - we never change our rounding mode away from RNE - we never disable support for subnormals in any way - we only ever use float32 and float64, we do not use the intel extended precision format Under those constraints, will -fsignaling-nans work?=