From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0C8A73857417; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:56:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0C8A73857417
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1666958182;
	bh=XqXpIIvo1Dnc+XgRGhtNoHN+1frTVznFNuByA7xEXDM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SgmPYQzylso9ExnCW6im1QJxl+aW/N9z93aHR1jbH/HwC/eXGFOdR5ONiXHzG4XfO
	 +1W26jpSsa4pEhKdzZp4Vu5W2EY/FsDWurPEfojeLerUcTKjFT9TQYP7KdwSEipmzE
	 QAZCf2I0xLYXyzqUHvLayjB4uPsQZ5PvvcoVziJA=
From: "florian.schanda at bmw dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107436] Is -fsignaling-nans still experimental?
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:56:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: florian.schanda at bmw dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107436-4-n9fIxsx4V9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107436

--- Comment #5 from Florian Schanda <florian.schanda at bmw dot de> ---
Richard, if I may rephrase your statement (for clarity), you're saying:

> Under your assumptions, -fsignaling-nans should work. There are no known =
bugs
> in this setup, but if you find something please report it.

Is that accurate?

If yes, then this is something we could live with :)=