From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AF9E63858D3C; Tue,  4 Jul 2023 15:03:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AF9E63858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688483026;
	bh=FhnO5UBwTmkuAEwiweXO9etsIrfl5hhD83XRzhRDXgE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yApKqrJx5cdGWx9aQ3P154rS+47aeeq9BU1pHgfQdmlCRc2fsYl4kGeV2FVe8Ppbx
	 539pT+9GuTHbydhymncNNhwaf2pLL1LiWCuPtorUylTYLlIb7OPfkCQkGLBZkLlLT8
	 cOqXrkZIubgw8HKlaothQem8X2m2f4Ch5RpUxJXI=
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107437] nested generic lambdas fail requiring unneded
 captures
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 15:03:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: c++-lambda, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-107437-4-ZuVCTm9x0x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107437

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55466
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D55466&action=3Dedit
failed experiment

I wondered if keeping function-local typedefs would be a simple fix, but a
number of modules tests regress with this patch.  I guess that's because of
problems with entries in the specialization hash tables referring to
function-local typedefs that we can't then reconnect when loading the modul=
e.=20
Really such entries (if we do add them) shouldn't persist after we're done
compiling the function.=