From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 741CC3858291; Fri,  3 Feb 2023 14:41:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 741CC3858291
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675435281;
	bh=EaGNlhkB9EJIqAJYcW4Yi3O3S7m36zV/irG3fydxPOA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tYTyxFuMH2u/DHtw4jHsFiYPMLsHQ8XeU3m+DW6qt+wVPIvok12Z5TzMg6AWrdQqJ
	 xQmXHnC6MzExPuIRBrSYEZhOK85MuOBYfivCeD+18DiurJ7X0IHfdn0C6O0gc7lY2H
	 cZQV/6ZztTMjlF1INjvmXIENXOI7mL7FYqeWZ4wY=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107461] [12/13 Regression] ambiguity error for friend with
 templated constexpr argument
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 14:41:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107461-4-qo7XxZu8zC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107461-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107461-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107461

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59e0376f607805ef9b67fd7b0a4a3084ab3571a5

commit r13-5684-g59e0376f607805ef9b67fd7b0a4a3084ab3571a5
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 3 09:41:10 2023 -0500

    c++: unexpected ADDR_EXPR after overload set pruning [PR107461]

    Here the ahead-of-time overload set pruning in finish_call_expr is
    unintentionally returning a CALL_EXPR whose (pruned) callee is wrapped
    in an ADDR_EXPR, despite the original callee not being wrapped in an
    ADDR_EXPR.  This ends up causing a bogus declaration mismatch error in
    the below testcase because the call to min in #1 gets expressed as a
    CALL_EXPR of ADDR_EXPR of FUNCTION_DECL, whereas the level-lowered call
    to min in #2 gets expressed instead as a CALL_EXPR of FUNCTION_DECL.

    This patch fixes this by stripping the spurious ADDR_EXPR appropriately.
    Thus the first call to min now also gets expressed as a CALL_EXPR of
    FUNCTION_DECL, matching the behavior before r12-6075-g2decd2cabe5a4f.

            PR c++/107461

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * semantics.cc (finish_call_expr): Strip ADDR_EXPR from
            the selected callee during overload set pruning.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/template/call9.C: New test.=