From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 338F63858D39; Thu,  3 Nov 2022 19:05:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 338F63858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667502321;
	bh=IVm3TKZq5yAf99v1xosmucyUGHWt6gWnQ0Wf7Iq2yD4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZCkfzWOwen4N4KI0X6frnL3lu7C5qePLROrbZJ+J90QN3EWfWqJl18aT/HkRGGlR2
	 tAePgEt32dXVE6yqopeSqCyH/orBETpxO9WxPs+3Mi44V9Qr1HOjS4QaTmwe1c58/L
	 dqr651e3FjlQSEhUrU1hzgGURleb1mikB+Xfjwy8=
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107492] Unhelpful -Wignored-qualifiers warning in template
 specialization
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 19:05:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107492-4-AfRpzrqsVi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107492-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107492

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #2)
>     The warning is wrong here, the qualifier serves a purpose and is not
>     ignored (c.f. PR c++/107492).

OK, I'm curious: what is its purpose?=