From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8C215385768A; Tue,  1 Nov 2022 16:54:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8C215385768A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667321674;
	bh=g9gkC8iI1cKIGhOIHi3eLCUS6Msr25lQVPN2K3FSjj4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sjCvhLL3jhTNXI4c7TcMRHZSE6pmkL6qMFyxIk6V9FCQTWq2Wuxq/swbf2DHJZhcU
	 T98N578UrVhTBh0trBT+Oerkc8BoVQN7GOzDbQzX0vuhNk+hYZSLrataM18Z5pyNc4
	 VsMvJzBKdKFskwlqGjUwvR9ZUFY1NWy90RSejpuQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107497] [13 regression] ICE during bootstrap
 after r13-3595-g7b1cdca6d6d594
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:54:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget
 everconfirmed cf_gccbuild bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-107497-4-7WT5Snx6wq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107497

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-01
               Host|powerpc64-linux-gnu,        |powerpc64-linux-gnu,
                   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu       |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
                   |                            |x86_64-linux-gnu
             Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu,        |powerpc64-linux-gnu,
                   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu       |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
                   |                            |x86_64-linux-gnu
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
              Build|powerpc64-linux-gnu,        |powerpc64-linux-gnu,
                   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu       |powerpc64le-linux-gnu
                   |                            |x86_64-linux-gnu
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Looks like it also fails on x86_64:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2022-November/771026.html

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2022-November/771027.html

I suspect building with mpfr/mpc/gmp in the source tree is definitely a good
test of the compiler, especially with floating point too :).=