From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 133013858D28; Wed,  2 Nov 2022 12:08:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 133013858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667390890;
	bh=/1OdCfVWG1gHAeqDxr8MQEJ+/riPjTIhzfh2UVZLYtc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=y64icgWg9XwYerOLhkpdcSFMIluMlXGJcSDiaXAFjwQ1hk74dEpND7NKYu3PnOhcx
	 5TUQyBZaY+F/yDVZkMGlF7lSQKERmQzpxy3TQflKVcd3z56QUG5M/1a1C0cQjriXJz
	 MPIOWN1/QlzejzC40ogwk0kgt/1gtUi4xeUHIwmM=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107500] Useless atexit entry for ~constant_init in
 eh_globals.cc
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 12:08:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component keywords
Message-ID: <bug-107500-4-QSHOuPCfuq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107500-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107500

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|libstdc++                   |c++
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't think this is a libstdc++ bug. We really do want that no-op destruc=
tor
to be in the library. It just shouldn't generate any code, but that's a
compiler problem.=