From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CB8043858D1E; Wed,  1 Nov 2023 14:08:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB8043858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1698847724;
	bh=fkSp1dLHFBsLEeB3lleI1Jv4SaC+4NJrZnCM7Wk7C6o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kvfV+FCd1BGCRt2Rb0KJ/F95T31qr39DjvJI1sR3EQY0WVJ41NwFXdEXDZ48oUKFI
	 CgxYWYLKO+0I9bkkzbsGa/YvOJyxMQc+2B4rcfSJvS0cUXkEQWrueyXlCFiDjAkP7K
	 rbl3eFknivmJyUsn5CRVySe3ogvE9q9ZgzfZnr4o=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107513] [Feature Request] Implement
 __attribute__((__nodebug__))
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 14:08:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107513-4-wLoTTlps06@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107513-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107513

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> The patch for PR 96780 added -ffold-simple-inlines which works for some
> specific functions. This attribute would extend that to arbitrary functio=
ns.

I discussed this with Jason and Patrick, and the -ffold-simple-inlines effe=
cts
are not appropriate for implementing this attribute, because the attribute
might get used on functions which cannot be trivially folded by the front e=
nd.

It would need to be implemented differently, but probably wouldn't be
difficult.=