From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 108BA3834EF9; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:56:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 108BA3834EF9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668704173;
	bh=XUn8v7RkphxVzfeDhuA+nMDcRBls+QZftH2whXKRNaA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=acmKWm4LMomjQJ9rq1wXl4UdFawDaqfatBdkyKzQhDWe1FxeoJ/S6PWF5WCFAUL7a
	 xOzB82iPaPgugAb9DXCj1OaPbCAoM7OstlWHBH4A0Naj3vRQXkgWNBEjQGtrRSCemQ
	 6lALA8C5g9QuKX3ojVOUCV3EKjcHHM25ZRS5IbRc=
From: "stammark at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107515] MVE: Generic functions do not accept _Float16
 scalars
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 16:56:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-107515-4-KHETNS8ApY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107515-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107515

Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Stam Markianos-Wright <stammark at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kevin Bracey from comment #2)
> I've just spotted another apparent generic selection problem in my
> reproducer for  bug 107714 - should I create a new issue for it?

Our patch series has gone up to the mailing list! For _Float16 see:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606587.html

For `vmuq` this:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606575.html

works on my side, so if it gets merged and works for your case, too, then I
guess we don't have to worry about a new bug report :)=