From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2B92B3858414; Fri,  4 Nov 2022 15:58:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B92B3858414
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667577532;
	bh=5wgd73fj/63kmS4aKRbK9vmR9LBCGT/BugFo4nPB5Jw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=iNVfKB9w9NTm5ysJ1EMXry+fBAcNoXOkN/2aecQpUPnfqCN3Iz576IfyUP8DuK09G
	 LCfmVtVf6BOWvJWzugIXmYN9BypNWtuxrwFEliQy+htMBcy2p1JRZ9xWQzaJXuZzLI
	 PpUdPtgjJlu2f9XpBVTPqaAAZ881y1SbI5eKcCLA=
From: "dangelog at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107525] propagate_const should not be using SFINAE on
 its conversion operators
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 15:58:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dangelog at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107525-4-oDv9tXfLLn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107525

--- Comment #9 from Giuseppe D'Angelo <dangelog at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)=20
> Please don't! At least not in the next 9 days. We intend to vote out LFTS=
v3
> at next week's meeting, there will be no more proposals for LFTS consider=
ed.
> And I don't want to derail the vote next week by having open proposals
> arriving at the last minute.

No problem, I wouldn't have done this before a few weeks anyhow.


> Feel free to file a library issue though. If propagate_const ever gets
> proposed for inclusion in the standard then this should be taken into
> account.

OK.

Thank you very much for the prompt fix.

(Ville: guess what, this bug stem from trying to make uic and friends use
propagate_const. Small world!)=