From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BB8653858C2D; Sat,  5 Nov 2022 09:29:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BB8653858C2D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667640556;
	bh=Rdo1bdrs30xdmeoJ1047hOqPATv2NIlpn7IZ/gR7p3Y=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uR7M+4jW6174rC6ahdjVVSsuCQesoDyVMNaZ/15V5/kUegALz3CeUctZScufP7igx
	 y9Q2X1RTL4bmK1ngWweIxg2lgoyVvVlyfJ3ntD27rHeUt2Bf+BDyH2uCqk1yv3cyXf
	 7TSqEZN5QjJftdEC2zLbJMapHv6tWNob/IDmvoWU=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107531] List of references calls destructors, add warning?
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2022 09:29:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107531-4-pyjTApEJ82@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107531

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unsurprisingly, -fanalyzer doesn't say anything useful about this, because =
it
doesn't support C++. PR 94355 tracks some of that (and the meta-bug that it
blocks tracks more).=